Minimization of Chronic Neck Pain in Military Aircrew and Vehicle Occupants
Navy SBIR 2020.1 - Topic N201-011 NAVAIR - Ms. Donna Attick - [email protected] Opens: January 14, 2020 - Closes: February 26, 2020 (8:00 PM ET)
TECHNOLOGY
AREA(S): Biomedical ACQUISITION
PROGRAM: PMA276 H-1 USMC Light/Attack Helicopters OBJECTIVE:
Design and develop computational models to understand and analyze acute and
chronic neck pain for combat air vehicle pilots and occupants taking into
consideration the interaction between seating systems, posture, and body-borne
equipment and the generation of neck pain. Included in this effort is the
requirement to develop an aircrew specific neck pain scale. DESCRIPTION:
Pilots and crew of combat air vehicles, including fixed-wing attack, fighter,
and rotary-wing aircraft, can be exposed to inertial and task position
stressors that generate pain. Repeated painful exposures with or without tissue
damage are precursors to pain sensitization and chronic pain. Chronic pain
leads to reduced operational readiness and long-term medical treatment. In his
25 SEPT 2017 letter, VADM Shoemaker called for �research to better understand,
prevent and treat the musculoskeletal consequences of helicopter service.� The
Navy needs a means of protection to minimize the development of chronic neck
pain while maintaining short duration, high onset acceleration protection
afforded by ejection and crashworthy seating. Equally important, though less
well understood, is the contribution of long-duration, static/quasi-static
loading to chronic pain development. Current seating systems designed to be a
'one-size-fits-all' with minimal adjustability were intended for short and
moderate duration exposures. Aircraft seating systems encompass a range of seat
back angles from 0 degrees (vertical) to 17 degrees pitched back and seat pan
angles from 0 degrees (horizontal) to 12 degrees pitched-up. Seated postures
vary ranging from long periods holding the same position while visually
scanning the area or instruments through turning to look over their shoulders
(�check six� position). All the while, aircrew are restrained in their seats
for missions as long as 12 hours and must be able to reach switches and
controls overhead, behind, to the side, and in front of them. Aircrews are
often outfitted with performance enhancement devices that are mounted to the
helmet, e.g., night vision devices, that increase the load and moment on the
cervical spine. PHASE I:
Design, develop, and determine the feasibility of using human biomechanical
models to expose a simulated occupant to inertial and positional stressors,
simulating the effect on the neck and onset of pain and predicting the spinal
sensitization and pain time course. Develop a preliminary aircrew neck-pain
scale.� The Phase I effort will include plans to be developed under Phase II. PHASE II:
Develop a human biomechanical model accounting for anthropometric variation of
military population (5th to 95th percentiles for height and weight), including
gender-related factors. Include models of seating (geometry and cushions),
restraints, cockpit geometry, and protective clothing / equipment; the target
platform includes fast jet tactical aircraft (e.g., F/A-18). Validate the
combined model against published data, including but not limited to the
references listed below. Use the model to analyze existing operational
procedures and propose improved operational guidelines. Validate the aircrew
neck-pain scale. Develop a prototype of the most promising protective concept
that provides adaptive seating, comfort and adjustability for the maximum range
of anthropometric sizes. Conduct experimental testing and evaluation. PHASE III
DUAL USE APPLICATIONS: Conduct operational unit evaluation of the prototype and
implement necessary design changes. Re-evaluate the predicted performance based
on implemented changes and revise the prototype based on results of evaluation
until desired optimum protection is achieved. REFERENCES: 1. Smith,
A.M. �The prevalence and operational significance of neck pain and back pain in
Air Combat Group: IAM-2016-003-CR.� Institute of Aviation Medicine - Adelaide,
Adelaide, Australia, 2016. 2. Ang, B.,
Monnier, A. and Harms-Ringdahl, K. �Neck/Shoulder Exercise for Neck Pain in Air
Force Helicopter Pilots: A Randomized Controlled Trial.� National Institutes of
Health, U.S. National Library of Medicine: Bethesda MD. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19770596/ 3. de
Oliveira, C. G. and Nadal, J. �Transmissibility of Helicopter Vibration in the
Spines of Pilots in Flight.� Aerospace Medical Association, 2005. https://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/asma/asem/2005/00000076/00000006/art00010 4. Quinn, K.
P. and Winkelstein, B. A. �Cervical Facet Capsular Ligament Yield Defines the
Threshold for Injury and Persistent Joint-Mediated Neck Pain.� Journal of
Biomechanics, 2007, pp. 2299-2306. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0021929006003939 5. Thuresson,
M., Ang, B., Linder, J. and Harms-Ringdahl, K. �Mechanical Load and EMG
Activity in the Neck Induced by Different Head-Worn Equipment and Neck
Postures.� International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 2005, pp.13-18. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0169814104001271 6. van den
Oord, M., De Loose, V., Meeuwsen, T., Sluiter, J. and Frings-Dresen, M. �Neck
Pain in Military Helicopter Pilots: Prevalence and Associated Factors.�
Military Medicine, 2010, pp. 55-60. https://academic.oup.com/milmed/article/175/1/55/4344519 KEYWORDS:
Neck Pain; Human Modeling; Neck Pain Scale; Anthropometric Variants; Neck Pain
Stressors; Adaptive Seating
|