Enhanced Sensor Resource Management Utilizing Bayesian Inference
Navy STTR 2019.A - Topic N19A-T002 NAVAIR - Ms. Donna Attick - [email protected] Opens: January 8, 2019 - Closes: February 6, 2019 (8:00 PM ET)
TECHNOLOGY AREA(S): Air
Platform, Battlespace, Electronics ACQUISITION PROGRAM: PMA290
Maritime Surveillance Aircraft OBJECTIVE: Augment
traditional first order logic sensor resource management approaches by
employing Bayesian inference approaches that leverage information that is
accumulated over a surveillance mission in a confined area of interest. DESCRIPTION: Recent advances
[Ref 3] in machine learning (ML), deep learning (DL), and other artificial
intelligence (AI) techniques have shown great promise in delivering significant
improvement in radar system performance for both surveillance (detection and
tracking) and imaging functions. So-called �cognitive� systems seek to combine
the optimization of sensor resources and capabilities with ML and data mining
techniques to provide an autonomous system that, given a high-level descriptor
(e.g., mission plan, Operational Situation/Tactical Situation (OPSIT/TACSIT)),
will automatically adjudicate the target environment and provide human
operators with actionable information or even take certain actions on its own
(e.g., modification of platform flight pattern) in response to what has been
learned. The objective is to develop a software-based system, prototyped in
MATLAB with the final product in Java, that can make any given radar system
�cognitive� by automatically understanding its native hardware capabilities and
executing the most appropriate radar function at any given moment in the
operational timeline in response to dynamic in-situ conditions present in a
typical Navy maritime surveillance environment. Bayesian inference is a strong
basis for this application as learning or experience can be used to update the
probability for a hypothesis that is guiding radar tasking. Many of the Navy
maritime surveillance missions involve surveilling the same geographical area
over a mission or across multiple missions. Such operations offer the
opportunity to significantly enhance mission success through learning-based
resource management. Clearly demonstrating how the proposed approach enhances
performance beyond that possible from first order logic expert driven
approaches and how the proposed approach is trained and maintained are
considered critical. PHASE I: Complete a top-level
design and demonstrate the feasibility of its approach to improve sensor
utilization using Bayesian inference as an addition to first order logic
approaches in sensor resource management. In order to facilitate the analysis,
the sensor suite may be limited to radar only but the approach should be easily
expandable to other Navy sensor systems such as electro-optic/infrared (EO/IR)
and electronic support measures (ESM). Perform an analysis that assumes
operation of the airborne sensor system is in a geographically constrained
operational area with multiple revisits over the course of a mission.
Operational maritime environment information will be provided by the Navy. The
Phase I effort will include prototype plans to be developed under Phase II. PHASE II: Develop a prototype
system based upon the Phase I design to provide and demonstrate that legacy
radar systems can be modified to provide the improved timeline utilization and
mission success. Perform performance assessments quantifying vessel tracking,
track maintenance, and imaging using target layouts and behaviors
representative of operational maritime environments provided by the Navy.
Deliver a detailed report and prototype system. PHASE III DUAL USE
APPLICATIONS: Complete development, perform final testing, and integrate and
transition the final solution to Naval airborne maritime surveillance
platforms. The high-level control logic to be utilized here is applicable to a
wide range of applications including law enforcement and border control
surveillance operations. REFERENCES: 1. Guerci, J. Cognitive
Radar: The Knowledge-Aided Fully Adapted Approach. Boston: Artech House, 2010.
http://www.gbv.de/dms/ilmenau/toc/629620326.PDF 2. Haykin, S. Cognitive
Dynamics Systems: Radar, Control, and Radio. Canada: Cambridge University
Press, 2012. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?arnumber=6218166 3. Abad, R. et.al. �Basic
Understanding of Cognitive Radar.� IEEE ANDESCON, 19-21 October 2016.
https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=7836270 KEYWORDS: Sensor Resource
Management; Maritime Surveillance; Artificial Intelligence; Machine Learning;
Command and Control; Cognition
|