Submarine Sensor Environmental Inference
Navy SBIR 2018.2 - Topic N182-135 ONR - Ms. Lore-Anne Ponirakis - [email protected] Opens: May 22, 2018 - Closes: June 20, 2018 (8:00 PM ET)
TECHNOLOGY AREA(S):
Battlespace, Information Systems, Sensors ACQUISITION PROGRAM: PEO
Integrated Warfare Systems, Advanced Processor Build (APB), Non-ACAT The technology within this
topic is restricted under the International Traffic in Arms Regulation (ITAR),
22 CFR Parts 120-130, which controls the export and import of defense-related
material and services, including export of sensitive technical data, or the
Export Administration Regulation (EAR), 15 CFR Parts 730-774, which controls
dual use items. Offerors must disclose any proposed use of foreign nationals
(FNs), their country(ies) of origin, the type of visa or work permit possessed,
and the statement of work (SOW) tasks intended for accomplishment by the FN(s)
in accordance with section 3.5 of the Announcement. Offerors are advised
foreign nationals proposed to perform on this topic may be restricted due to
the technical data under US Export Control Laws. OBJECTIVE: Develop
environmental inference capabilities to provide in situ characterizations of
the speed and attenuation of sound in the seabed and water column to enhance
the tactical decisions and warfighting posture of submarines so informed. DESCRIPTION: In light of an
increasingly competitive undersea operational arena, the Navy is in need of
improved environmental situational awareness, and in particular sound speed
profile (SSP) and bottom properties that affect the performance of submarine
sonar sensors. Current approaches rely heavily on databases and remote ocean
models to provide descriptions of the environment. The data base and model
information can be compared to and in some cases coupled with an in situ
measurement using a submarine expendable bathythermograph (SSXBT) that measures
temperature and depth, but the available communication bandwidth limits the
ability to push high-granularity model data forward and the cost and effort of
SSXBT launch limits the practical update rate from that source. Inversion, data
assimilation, and artificial intelligence methods that are able to fuse the
traditional sources of data with local measurements like seawater injection
temperature and �matched field� information derived from the sonar systems are
needed to improve the currency of the environmental picture and provide measures
of uncertainty for the picture so obtained. PHASE I: Develop a framework
for exploiting existing in situ data from sonar systems coupled with other
measurements and legacy environmental support products to produce a
multi-source inference of the submarine�s surroundings. Analyze and specify the
sonar or other data requirements necessary to develop and support the determination
and representation of the multi-source inference and its uncertainty. Develop a
Phase II plan. PHASE II: Using operational,
research and development (R&D), academic, or other measurement data, refine
the methodology and conduct proof-of-concept demonstrations and tests of the
multi-source inference algorithm and the impact of the increased skill on the
operation of a candidate sonar system. Develop partnerships with Program
Executive Office Integrated Warfare Systems Undersea Systems (PEO IWS-5) and
other stakeholders in development of an Advanced Processer Build (APB) embedded
tactical decision aid. PHASE III DUAL USE APPLICATIONS:
Transition the resulting algorithm through the Advanced Processing Build (APB)
tactical software development program that is designed to improve Navy
submarine acoustic performance by taking full advantage of commercial
processing hardware. The APB process will couple suitable algorithms developed
under this SBIR topic with Prime Contractor engineering, integration, and
testing to transition the enhanced capability to the fleet. REFERENCES: 1. Baggeroer, A. B.,
Kuperman, W. A., and Mikhalevsky, P. N. �An overview of matched field methods
in ocean acoustics.� IEEE J. Oceanic Eng. 18, 1993, p. 401. http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/262292/ 2. Siderius, M., Harrison, C.
H., and Porter, M. B. �A passive fathometer technique for imaging seabed
layering using ambient noise.� The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
120, 2006, pp. 1315-1323. http://hlsresearch.com/personnel/porter/papers/JASA/PassiveFath.pdf 3. Gemba, K. L., Hodgkiss, W.
S., and Gerstoft, P. �Adaptive and compressive matched field processing.� The
Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 141, 2017, p. 92. http://asa.scitation.org/doi/10.1121/1.4973528 4. Thomas, Adam J. �Tri-Level
Optimization For Anti-Submarine Warfare Mission Planning.� M.S. thesis in
Operations Research, Naval Postgraduate School, Monterey, CA., 2008 www.dtic.mil/get-tr-doc/pdf?AD=ADA488902 KEYWORDS: Ocean; Acoustic;
Inference; Bayesian; Machine Learning; Environment; Matched Field
|