Novel Polymer Binder Systems for Advanced Energetic Formulations
Navy SBIR 2018.2 - Topic N182-129 ONR - Ms. Lore-Anne Ponirakis - [email protected] Opens: May 22, 2018 - Closes: June 20, 2018 (8:00 PM ET)
TECHNOLOGY AREA(S):
Materials/Processes, Weapons ACQUISITION PROGRAM: PEO IWS
11, Rolling Airframe Missile The technology within this
topic is restricted under the International Traffic in Arms Regulation (ITAR),
22 CFR Parts 120-130, which controls the export and import of defense-related
material and services, including export of sensitive technical data, or the
Export Administration Regulation (EAR), 15 CFR Parts 730-774, which controls
dual use items. Offerors must disclose any proposed use of foreign nationals
(FNs), their country(ies) of origin, the type of visa or work permit possessed,
and the statement of work (SOW) tasks intended for accomplishment by the FN(s)
in accordance with section 3.5 of the Announcement. Offerors are advised
foreign nationals proposed to perform on this topic may be restricted due to
the technical data under US Export Control Laws. OBJECTIVE: Develop elastomeric
polymer binder systems with controllable chain-extension and cure chemistries
that are suitable for formulating advanced energetic oxidizer, fuel, and
explosives ingredients using conventional and emerging manufacturing techniques
such as microfluidics engineering and additive manufacturing (AM).� A
capability for small batch production is desired for transition to follow-on
energetic formulations development. DESCRIPTION: In cast cure
energetic formulations, the polymer binder system is the key enabling
technology for establishing critical properties including mechanical response,
thermal degradation, insensitive munitions (IM) compliance, particle adhesion,
and chemical stability relating to aging/safe life. Currently, the rocket motor
and warhead design and manufacturing communities have access to a severely
limited set of polymer binder systems. The most prominent�hydroxyl-terminated
polybutadiene (HTPB)�is not chemically compatible with potentially
high-performing oxidizers such as ammonium dinitramide (ADN), often requires
the use of specialized �bonding-agent� chemical additives for proper
particle-binder adhesion, and utilizes decades-old, toxic, isocyanate-based
cure chemistry that provides inadequate cure control for emerging AM
techniques. Historic development and availably of HTPB-based formulations
coupled with resistance to invest in and qualify new energetic formulations led
to its wide-spread use; however, the emergence of new polymer/soft chemistry
technology, new energetic ingredients, current IM requirements, and new
manufacturing techniques warrant development of new, �off-the-shelf� binder
systems for advanced energetic formulations. The focus of this SBIR topic is to
design and produce polymer binder systems where polymer backbone and cure
chemistries allow for tailored/on-demand curing and enhanced composite
formulation energy density (energetic chemical moieties and/or increased solids
fill), while maintaining critical energetic formulation properties (i.e.,
multi-ingredient compatibility and adhesion, favorable IM response, low
toxicity, high elongation, long-term stability, low modulus, and low glass
transition temperature). HTPB will serve as a baseline binder system for
comparison. The emphasis of the effort will be polymer backbone and cure
chemistry development, leading to resultant binder system evaluation in terms
of cure and crosslink control, multi-ingredient/oxidizer compatibility, thermal
stability, mechanical properties, processability via AM and conventional
mixing/casting methods, and composite formulation energy density. These new
binder cure motifs (i.e., chemically-, thermally-, light-activated), and
polymer backbone chemistries (e.g., co-block, energetic functional groups) will
be combined to enhance critical formulation properties, and scaled
appropriately for functional formulation development, testing, and transition
to the energetic material manufacturing communities. Such binder systems will
provide a much needed, broader commercial ingredient base to enable emerging
advanced energetic materials technology. Results of this effort are expected to
facilitate improved tactical rocket motor and warhead formulations with maximum
energy content and enhanced IM response, amenable to emerging AM methods. This
work would also help alleviate single-source and poor binder-performance
related issues currently being experienced by the rocket motor community with
regard to HTPB. PHASE I: Demonstrate the
capability to design and synthesize new, novel elastomer polymer binder systems
with properties as described above. At least five polymer systems should be
developed at a reasonable scale (10 � 100 grams) for associated thermal and
mechanical properties evaluation by methods including Differential Scanning
Calorimetry (DSC) and Instron stress-strain experimentation. Chemical
stability, in addition to multi-ingredient compatibility will be assessed by methods
such as Vacuum Thermal Stability (VTS) as outlined in MIL-STD-286C or
equivalent [Ref 3]. This should include nitramine explosives, metal fuels, and
strong oxidizers such as ammonium dinitramide and ammonium perchlorate. PHASE II: Down-select from successfully demonstrated polymer systems from Phase I and provide in a reasonable scale (hundreds of grams) for extensive binder gum-stock and formulation studies to include particle/binder adhesion, formulation mechanical properties, formulation aging characterization, and formulation performance testing (e.g., burn rate, energy release, etc.), in addition to a demonstration in a novel AM process that emphasizes cure/crosslink chemistry control. Testing will be defined prior to Phase II depending on success of Phase I efforts and which type of formulation (propellant vs. explosive) is chosen for Phase II scale up, formulation, and performance assessment activities. Pursue efforts to partner with appropriate DoD points of contact (POCs) for IM program insertion. It is probable that the work
under this effort will be classified under Phase II (see Description section
for details). PHASE III DUAL USE
APPLICATIONS: Conduct a tactical rocket motor formulation, manufacture, and
testing demonstration with a DoD or industry partner as needed, using the most
promising binder system candidate in the rocket motor formulation. This
demonstration should be with a formulation comparable to a HTPB analog rocket
motor baseline with the goal of demonstrating superior thermal, chemical,
aging, performance, and other properties by utilizing the advanced binder
system. Commercial applications of technologies developed under this topic
would be polymers for applications which experience a wide range of
temperatures such as automotive industry or even commercial space launch. REFERENCES: 1. Kubota, N. Propellants and
Explosives. Weinheim: WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, 2007. http://www.getanewgun.com/Pyrotechnic/Pyrotechnic_Books/Propellants_and_Explosives_Thermochemistry_and_Combustion_by_Naminosuke_Kubota.pdf 2. Carraher, C E.� Polymer
Chemistry. New York: Marcel Dekker, Inc., 2000. 3. MIL-STD-286C, MILITARY
STANDARD: PROPELLANTS, SOLID: SAMPLING, EXAMINATION AND TESTING. 1991. http://everyspec.com/MIL-STD/MIL-STD-0100-0299/MIL-STD-286C_8618/ KEYWORDS: Polymer; Binder;
IM; Propellant; Explosives; Hydroxyl-terminated Polybutadiene (HTPB); Ammonium
Dinitramide; Cross-link
|