Adaptable Boat Launch and Recovery System
Navy SBIR 2018.1 - Topic N181-056 NAVSEA - Mr. Dean Putnam - [email protected] Opens: January 8, 2018 - Closes: February 7, 2018 (8:00 PM ET)
TECHNOLOGY AREA(S):
Ground/Sea Vehicles ACQUISITION PROGRAM: PMS 500,
DDG 1000 Class Destroyer Program The technology within this
topic is restricted under the International Traffic in Arms Regulation (ITAR),
22 CFR Parts 120-130, which controls the export and import of defense-related
material and services, including export of sensitive technical data, or the
Export Administration Regulation (EAR), 15 CFR Parts 730-774, which controls
dual use items. Offerors must disclose any proposed use of foreign nationals
(FNs), their country(ies) of origin, the type of visa or work permit possessed,
and the statement of work (SOW) tasks intended for accomplishment by the FN(s)
in accordance with section 5.4.c.(8) of the Announcement. Offerors are advised
foreign nationals proposed to perform on this topic may be restricted due to
the technical data under US Export Control Laws. OBJECTIVE: Develop technology
required to handle an array of different hull forms and vessel types in boat
bay launch and recovery system. DESCRIPTION: There is a
Navy-wide need for a common vehicle launch and recovery mechanism among ships
without a well deck. Currently, surface ships without a well deck each have a
different method of launch and recovery, and are driven toward a specific
craft.� A common launch and recovery system that can launch and recover a
variety of craft instituted on all surface ship platforms will be a great
benefit in both cost and mission capability. a. Boat Bay Door - Trapezoid
Shape PHASE I: Develop a concept to
transport a variety of vehicles in and out of DDG 1000 using the specifications
in the description with no limitation on how the mechanism should function or
what any components should look like.� The concept will be judged by the
transport�s ability to transfer the vehicles specified in the description
without damage and not require more than five Sailors to operate.�
Demonstration of feasibility will come from calculations to verify management
of the load and a 3D physics-based computer model showing a concept of
operation.� The Phase I Option, if awarded, will include the initial design
specifications and capabilities description to build a prototype solution in
Phase II.� Develop a Phase II plan. PHASE II: Based on the
results of the Phase I effort and the Phase II Statement of Work (SOW), develop
and deliver a prototype to demonstrate capability at a scale to be defined
during Phase I. The demonstration will take place at the small business
facility and will include transferring mock up vehicles referenced in the
description. Naval Surface Warfare Center Carderock Division
(NSWCCD) Little Creek will provide the vehicles for the demonstration. The
demonstration will be judged on the ease of installation, ability to transfer
the loads in the description without damage, and the ability to execute the
system with five or fewer persons.� Evaluation results will be used to refine
the prototype into an initial Craft Handling System design. Provide drawings,
installation and maintenance instructions.� The company will prepare a Phase
III development plan to transition the technology to Navy and potential
commercial use. PHASE III DUAL USE
APPLICATIONS: Support the Navy in evaluating the scale system delivered in
Phase II.� Based on analysis performed during Phase II, recommend test fixtures
and methodologies to support environmental, shock, and vibration testing and
qualification.� The small business and the Navy will jointly determine final
system design for operational evaluation, including required safety testing and
certification.� Provide a technical work package to enable the system
installation on board the DDG 1000 utilizing the test results and any lessons
learned from the prototype testing in Phase II. REFERENCES: 1. �Proceedings of the 2016
Launch & Recovery Symposium.� American Society of Naval Engineers. http://www.navalengineers.org/Resources/Product-Info/productcd/LR2016 2. �Proceedings of the 2014
Launch and Recovery Symposium.� American Society of Naval Engineers. http://www.navalengineers.org/Resources/Product-Info/productcd/LR2014 3. Hanyok, Lauren W. and
Smith, Timothy C.� �Launch and Recovery System Literature Review.� Naval
Surface Warfare Center Carderock Division, Hydromechanics Department Report
NSWCCD-50-TR-2010/071, December 2010. http://www.dtic.mil/get-tr-doc/pdf?AD=ADA590153 4. Kimber, Andy. �Boat Launch
and Recovery � A Key Enabling Technology For Flexible Warships.� Pacific 2012,
Sydney, Australia 31 Jan-3 Feb 2012. http://www.bmtdsl.co.uk/media/6097819/BMTDSL-Boat-Launch-and-Recovery-Conpaper-Pacificcon-Jan12.pdf KEYWORDS: Watercraft Launch
and Recovery; Boat Launch; Ship Launch and Recovery System; UUV launch and
Recovery; USV Launch and Recovery; Shipboard Boat Deployment.
|