Develop and Apply Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning Techniques for Next-Generation Mission Planning
Navy SBIR 2018.1 - Topic N181-018 NAVAIR - Ms. Donna Attick - [email protected] Opens: January 8, 2018 - Closes: February 7, 2018 (8:00 PM ET)
TECHNOLOGY AREA(S): Air
Platform, Battlespace, Weapons ACQUISITION PROGRAM: PMA 281
(UAS) Strike Planning & Execution Systems The technology within this topic
is restricted under the International Traffic in Arms Regulation (ITAR), 22 CFR
Parts 120-130, which controls the export and import of defense-related material
and services, including export of sensitive technical data, or the Export
Administration Regulation (EAR), 15 CFR Parts 730-774, which controls dual use
items. Offerors must disclose any proposed use of foreign nationals (FNs),
their country(ies) of origin, the type of visa or work permit possessed, and
the statement of work (SOW) tasks intended for accomplishment by the FN(s) in
accordance with section 5.4.c.(8) of the Announcement. Offerors are advised
foreign nationals proposed to perform on this topic may be restricted due to
the technical data under US Export Control Laws. OBJECTIVE: Develop an
approach to exploit artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML)
techniques (e.g., deep learning [DL]) to improve mission planning capability,
and to provide autonomous and dynamic mission and strike planning capabilities
in support of manned and unmanned vehicles and weapon systems. DESCRIPTION: AI, and various
versions of ML, have been applied to many fields such as cancer research,
complex games like Jeopardy, Poker, and GO, and more recently heart attack
prediction with great success [Ref 8].� These techniques have begun to be
investigated and researched related to the topic of mission planning, as
discussed at a recent conference, Tactical Advancement for the Next Generation
(TANG).� This SBIR topic seeks to demonstrate how AI and ML can be applied to
multi-vehicle, multi-domain mission planning.� Mission and strike planning are
complex processes, integrating specific performance characteristics for each
platform into a comprehensive mission.� The Joint Mission Planning System
(JMPS), a software application, consists of a basic framework and unique
mission planning environment software packages for each platform.� To fully
appreciate the overall complexity, a basic understanding of the planning
(operational and tactical) process workflow as well as the actual human
involvement in the mission planning process is necessary.� The result of this
project will provide the foundation of how to train the computer and exploit AI
capabilities to generate automatic mission and strike plans for multi-vehicle,
multi domain scenarios involving manned and unmanned systems.� The developer
should also consider how to deal with different levels of security
classifications in ingestion of data for training and subsequently in
generating mission and strike plans, to include shared plan representation,
adaptive coordination and interoperability. PHASE I: Define and develop a
concept for how AI and DL/ML will be applied to the mission and strike planning
process as well as dynamic re-planning.� Identify what type of processing power
is needed for a representative computing environment. Determine, when employing
AI and ML, the level of improvement in the mission and strike planning process
and in mission planner performance, and how AI and ML would generate mission
plans in a near-autonomous mode, given the current workflow.� The Phase I
effort will include prototype plans to be developed under Phase II. PHASE II: Develop a prototype
approach based on the Phase I concept using available commercial off-the-shelf
(COTS) computing environment. PHASE III DUAL USE
APPLICATIONS: Test the developed technology in simulated mission environment
and determine if and how much of the prototype is ready for integration into
JMPS.� Based upon that information, continue working on the prototype with the
ultimate goal toward the nearly full autonomous mission and strike planning
operation. REFERENCES: 1. Chen, K. "Watson
claims to predict cancer, but who trained it to 'think?'" Recode, August
16, 2016. http://www.recode.net/2016/8/16/12490110/watson-artificial-intelligence-machine-learning-cancer-prediction-human-input 2. Hof, R. D. "Deep
Learning." MIT Technology Review. https://www.technologyreview.com/s/513696/deep-learning/ 3. Parloff, R. "Why Deep
Learning Is Suddenly Changing Your Life." Fortune, September 28, 2016. http://fortune.com/ai-artificial-intelligence-deep-machine-learning/ 4. Noyes, K. "5 things
you need to know about A.I.: Cognitive, neural and deep, oh my!" Computer
World, March 3, 2016. http://www.computerworld.com/article/3040563/enterprise-applications/5-things-you-need-to-know-about-ai-cognitive-neural-and-deep-oh-my.html 5. "Summer Study on
Autonomy." Defense Science Board, June 2016, http://www.acq.osd.mil/dsb/reports/2010s/DSBSS15.pdf?zoom_highlight=Autonomy 6. "The Role of Autonomy
in DoD Systems." Defense Science Board Task Force Report, July 2012, http://fas.org/irp/agency/dod/dsb/autonomy.pdf 7. �Watson,� IBM website. http://www.ibm.com/watson/ 8. Hutson, M.
"Self-taught artificial intelligence beats doctors at predicting heart
attacks." Science Magazine, 14 April 2017. http://www.sciencemag.org/news/2017/04/self-taught-artificial-intelligence-beats-doctors-predicting-heart-attacks KEYWORDS: Artificial
Intelligence; Machine Learning; Mission and Strike Planning; Multi-Vehicle;
Multi-Domain; Autonomous
|